We're radicals for democracy.

We want to fight the power of Big Money in politics by helping small dollar donors engage in the political process. We want more citizens to vote and run for office. And we want to give people a platform to take action - whether it’s by joining a political community, or organizing one of their own. 

We have different backgrounds, hail from different countries and maintain different political viewpoints. But we share a common mission: strengthening democracy through citizen empowerment and participation. That means being:

RADICALLY INCLUSIVE. 

Crowdpac is a free and open technology platform (not a PAC); we’re non-partisan and aren’t controlled by any political committee, party, or politician. Our investors and our board are made up of diverse, nonpolitical entities (such as venture capital funds and social impact investors) and our board of advisors span the political and ideological spectrum to assure balance. We uphold strict community content standards, and will never permit campaigns that are in conflict with our values or in support of these hate groups identified by the Southern Poverty Law Center. Our platform currently serves the United States, United Kingdom and France, but our aim is to expand to every democracy on the planet.

RADICALLY OBJECTIVE. 

Crowdpac’s tools are powered, in part, by objective data sourced from our proprietary database of nearly 200 million campaign contributions. We’ve released our unique algorithm that maps candidates along an ideological spectrum to the public through Stanford University’s Social Science data collection program which makes it available online to anyone who wants to use it.

RADICALLY TRANSPARENT. 

Our cards are on the table; we try to show the names and faces behind each campaign on our platform, and we work to ensure that “pledge” campaigns fulfill their conditions. We believe disclosure is a public right. Our platform is fully compliant with all campaign regulations and disclosure requirements. We’ve even pioneered new methods of transparency by publishing detailed campaign finance breakdowns for nearly every state and federal candidate in the United States on our site. Crowdpac’s data has been cited thousands of times by some of the most highly respected journalistic outlets in the world tracking campaign finance including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal and Washington Post.  

RADICALLY PROTECTIVE of you and your data. We won’t ever sell, rent or share your private information (see ourPrivacy Policy here). Our business is supported through crowdfunding (you can read more about our pricing structure here); after you donate to a campaign on Crowdpac, we’ll occasionally suggest other campaigns that might interest you. Crowdpac is a candidate for B-Corp certification, requiring the highest levels of transparency and fairness towards our customers, employees, and the environment. If we can ever help you or improve our service in any way please don’t hesitate to contact us by emailing support@crowdpac.com - we’ll get back to you at the earliest possible time.

Crowdpac's Scoring System

Crowdpac calculates objective scores for political candidates showing their overall political position and, where possible, their position on specific issues. The scores use a liberal/conservative scale: 10L is the most liberal and 10C is the most conservative. In some cases, candidates are given scores showing as 10+L or 10+C; this means they are more extreme than our scale can show. Overall scores are based on publicly available campaign contributions information, analyzed by our data model. Issue scores are based on campaign contributions and Congressional voting records. When candidates do not have a score, we either do not have the minimum amount of data needed or the analysis is inconclusive; if we cannot accurately place a candidate on the liberal/conservative scale, we won't provide scores.

Crowdpac Data Model

The Crowdpac data model combines three sources of publicly available information about candidates:

  • Money - which individuals or organizations have contributed to the candidates' campaigns, and which campaigns the candidates themselves have contributed to, as reported to federal and state regulatory authorities. This gives us a good indication of their overall political position.
  • Speech - what the candidates say: the bills they sponsor or co-sponsor (if they are currently in office or have been elected before); the words or phrases they use most, as reported in legislative text and floor records, and candidate statements made on official websites, Facebook profiles and via official tweets. This gives us a good indication of their political priorities.
  • Votes - the candidates' voting record (if they are currently in office or have been in office before). This helps increase the accuracy of our predictions - from around 92% to 94% - and to estimate candidates' position on specific issues.

It works like this: to calculate overall scores for candidates - both incumbents and new candidates - we rely on campaign finance records. Donors to political campaigns tend to support candidates who share their policy preferences and/or personal interests, and screen out those who do not. This generates large amounts of information on where candidates stand. In analyzing the patterns of who gives to whom, our data model is able to make inferences about the issue positions of both candidates and donors. Additional information on candidates' personal contributions made to other campaigns are incorporated to improve the model’s predictions. As a result, it represents a new way of forecasting how a candidate would likely vote and legislate if elected to office.

To calculate scores on specific issues, for incumbent candidates, we use Congressional voting records; for non-incumbent candidates with no voting record, we compare their donors with the donors of incumbents.

We calculate scores for as many candidates as possible. It depends on the candidate, but often a single donation that candidate made to another candidate is enough for the model to calculate an overall score. In most cases, a candidate must receive 50 donations before we can calculate issue scores. In all cases, the contributions need to have been reported to federal or state regulatory authorities. The more data we have on a candidate, the more confident we can be about our scores. On each candidate's profile page, we provide a summary of the availability of data for that candidate.

You can find a more detailed academic explanation of our data model, including a paper prepared by co-founder Adam Bonica, Assistant Professor of Political Science at Stanford University here: http://data.stanford.edu/dime/

The Team

Steve Hilton CEO and co-founder. Steve currently teaches at Stanford University's d.school (Hasso Plattner Institute of Design) and was formerly Senior Advisor to UK Prime Minister David Cameron, in which position he championed data transparency and the redistribution of power from government to citizens.

Adam Bonica Data and Politics Expert and co-founder. Adam is an Assistant Professor of political science at Stanford University. The focus of his research is the quantitative measurement of political ideology. He built the algorithms that drives the various Crowdpac products and services.

Gisel Kordestani COO and co-founder. Gisel is a tech entrepreneur who has worked in early stage startups, management consulting and spent over eight years at Google in senior global roles in finance and new business development. She holds an MBA from Harvard Business School and a BA in International Affairs from the American University in Paris.

Paul Hilder Chief International Officer and co-founder. Paul was Vice-President of Global Campaigns at Change.org, where he led the platform’s global growth to 80 million users in 20 countries. He co-founded the British progressive movement 38 Degrees and openDemocracy.net. He has also played leadership roles at Avaaz.org, Oxfam, Purpose, Here Now and the Young Foundation.

Eric Smith Head of Engineering. Eric co-founded Bistro Studios where he developed web sites and applications for clients like TOMS Shoes and Barnes & Noble. He holds a BS in Computer Science and Mathematics from Pepperdine University.

Jesse Thomas Head of Product. A seasoned political digital strategist, Jesse led the online campaign for President Obama’s reelection campaign that registered over a million people to vote. He served as Digital Director for NextGen Climate and has run numerous successful digital engagement and creative campaigns for non-profits and government.

Mason Harrison Head of Communications. Mason is a seasoned public affairs and communications professional who previously served as a spokesperson and political aide for the presidential campaigns of Governor Mitt Romney and Senator John McCain. He received a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science at UC Davis.

Liz Jaff Head of Business Development. Liz is an accomplished political operative working for both Obama Campaigns (running Regional Field in 2007-08 in multiple states and Get out the Vote efforts in Ohio for 2012). She has managed competitive races in local elections and worked on coalition building in both the Obama administration and in Congress.

Mike Polyakov VP data science. Mike previously served as research director at California Common Sense and as a software engineer at Lockheed Martin. He holds a PhD from UC Berkeley in political science and a BA and ME in computer science from Cornell University.

Dan Carson Head of Design and User Experience. Dan was the Lead Interaction Designer for the 2012 Obama Campaign, Product Designer at Trunk Club and Change.org, and Senior Designer at Modest. He has done work for dozens of political campaigns, Fortune 500 companies, and non-profits. Dan has AAA degree from The Art Institute of Seattle in Interactive Media Development.

Fernando Velloso Neto Product Manager. Fernando received his MA in International Policy from Stanford University, during which time he consulted for Brazil's Mission to the United Nations and the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington DC. Previously he was a lawyer and worked in Brazil's Federal Congress.

Ethan Kessinger Product Manager. Ethan received a B.A. in Science, Technology and Society from Stanford University. He is a former AmeriCorps service member.

Cedric Hulin Head of User Acquistion. Cedric developed Web Analytics and Digital Marketing skills working for the telecommunication company Orange. He holds a Master of Science in Marketing & Business Development from EDHEC Business School (France).

Stephen Melrose Senior Software Engineer. Stephen is a Software Engineering Consultant, previously a Lead Software Engineer for BSkyB responsible for leading teams working on high-performance and high-availability web-based systems. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Multimedia Technology from Huddersfield University, UK.

Brian Carstensen Software Engineer. Brian has a degree in graphic design from Columbia College Chicago, and worked in the field for a number of years before finding a niche in front-end web development. Previously, he helped build Zooniverse.org, the web's finest platform for online citizen science.

Irene Shin Political Director. Irene is an experienced political operative and fundraiser. She has worked for an array of campaigns and has raised millions of dollars for candidates, national political committees, and political action funds. She holds a BA in political science from the University of California, Riverside.

Salim Zymet Engagement Director. Salim has served as a digital director for non-profits, state-wide campaigns, and startups. He was most recently the digital director for Hillary Clinton in Ohio. He has experience running numerous campaigns to drive effective offline action through digital content. He received a B.A. in Political Science at UCLA.

Golda Velez Senior Software Engineer. Golda has designed data handling frameworks for several silicon valley startups, delivered key datasets at Factual, a leading location data provider, and was the primary maintainer of Webglimpse search software. She holds a BS in Applied Mathematics from Caltech.

Chris Gmyr Senior Software Engineer. Chris founded Modo Media Group where he built applications and sites for clients all over the world. More recently, Chris was a Senior Engineer at Dose where he built high-availability sites that handled over 20 Million users per month.

Advisors

Ben Ginsberg is Washington DC’s leading lawyer for Republicans. He is a partner at Jones Day and Co-chair of the Presidential Commission on Election Administration.

Marc Elias is Washington DC’s leading lawyer for Democrats, representing candidates and PACs. He is a partner at Perkins Coie.

Jonathan Zucker is founder and CEO of Democracy Engine, a non-partisan payment processing service for political candidates and issue campaigns.

Tammy Haddad is President and CEO of Washington DC-based Haddad Media and has over 25 years of experience as an executive producer of political web, cable and network programs.

Pablo Chavez is Vice President, Global Public Policy and Government Affairs at LinkedIn.

Kevin Twohy has worked with startups, creative agencies, and large corporations to design innovative and intuitive user experiences. He studied Mathematics and English at UCLA.

Investors

We have raised our seed round of financing from several top tier venture capital funds and angel investors, including NEA, InterWest, Index Ventures, CAA and SV Angel.

Contact Us

Please send us an email at info@crowdpac.com

Jobs

We are actively seeking new talent to join our team. Please check out our jobs page or email us at jobs@crowdpac.com.